• AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I tried to to read the article but it’s paywalled. Is user privacy being compromised? Are people having their identities made public and tied to their sex chats?

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago
      3 excerpts of article answering your question.

      Conversations with generative AI chatbots are near instantaneous—you type a prompt and the AI responds. If the systems are configured improperly, however, this can lead to chats being exposed. In March, researchers at the security firm UpGuard discovered around 400 exposed AI systems while scanning the web looking for misconfigurations. Of these, 117 IP addresses are leaking prompts. The vast majority of these appeared to be test setups, while others contained generic prompts relating to educational quizzes or nonsensitive information, says Greg Pollock, director of research and insights at UpGuard. “There were a handful that stood out as very different from the others,” Pollock says.

      It was not possible to identify which websites or services are leaking the data, Pollock says, adding it is likely from small instances of AI models being used, possibly by individuals rather than companies. No usernames or personal information of people sending prompts were included in the data, Pollock says.

      Across the 952 messages gathered by UpGuard—likely just a glimpse of how the models are being used—there were 108 narratives or role-play scenarios, UpGuard’s research says. Five of these scenarios involved children, Pollock adds, including those as young as 7.

      the rest of the (quite in-depth) article revolved around user dependence on LLMs for social and sexual interaction and the potential for abuse by institutional actors.

      • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Thanks for taking time to respond with the excerpts.

        So am I wrong? the story smells like a nothingburger made spicier by including pedophilia in the mix?