So the news story is that Russian/UAE firm doesn’t want to join an American CSAM group to scan their “end to end encrypted” service?
But on the other hand, even though they aren’t members, they do remove CSAM when identified and confirmed, just not as fast as some of these automated services would like?
On the one hand we have
And on the other we have no critical analysis or explanation of how the cap works and why £2.50 would reduce benefits by £500. Without this it sounds like “old man grumbles”.
If this is true then its awful, but I would have hoped that a BBC article would provide a bit more context.
If these people are really that bad off then we should just provide a better pension rather than fucking around with lots of tiny allowances. Either people dont have enough money and have to choose between heating and eating and we support them, or they don’t.
I need some, any, context before I can understand this.