Trump is taking office soon and going to undo anything Biden does. So I’ll ask this simple question that you’ve been dodging once again:

What do you expect Biden to do that won’t just be undone by Trump or blocked by Congress? That will actually make a difference.

And your response was speaking out against Israel which has nothing to do with him pardoning his son and it isn’t “doing something for us”.

I’m pointing out he could be doing other things instead of just pardoning his son and nothing else.

This implies that he has to choose between pardoning his son and doing something else. Like the trolley dilemma. But that isn’t the case. He isn’t choosing pardoning his son over another task. Why does that need to be explained to you?

So what does the act of pardoning his son prevent him from doing?

What does that have to do with pardoning his son?

Biden didn’t hand the country to Trump. People like yourself shitting on democrats are the reason Trump won. You’re cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Instead of throwing a hissy fit why don’t you actually say what you think he should be doing instead of pardoning his son?

Why should Biden sacrifice his son just to appear neutral when Trump is getting away with felonies?

It has everything to do with the streaming service. Because they can’t sell as many prime memberships without it.

It’s not a bonus. They weren’t selling as many memberships as they wanted so they had to make the deal better by adding the service.

No streaming service. No membership.

It wasn’t “tacked on” because Amazon is generous. They did the math and decided it would help them make more profit by selling more Amazon prime memberships.

No one feels they are owed. They feel it is not worth it to pay for ads.

How can it be a free trial if you’re paying for a membership? Just to make them more money by watching ads?

Your comment sounds like something a marketing team would say.

Whoever wrote this article seems to think middle class families are earning less than 100k. As a trade worker I make about that and that’s before adding in my wife’s income.

The article is trying to make it seem like only the wealthy are getting the benefits of the inflation reduction act. Which isn’t true.